As discussed in the section on Celtic ethnic and cultural
identity, the surviving ancient sources on the "Celts," both
Greek and Latin, were written well after the late Hallstatt and
early La Tène periods discussed here. The authors all come from
cultural backgrounds very different from that of the "Celts."
Each has his own reasons for writing about the "Celts," none of
which includes leaving an accurate and objective ethnographic
description for the use of modern historians. Studies of the
ancient "Celts" cannot but refer to the classical sources, since
there is no early Celtic literature preserved at all; their
temporal, geographic and cultural distance from their subject,
as well as the exigencies of their respective genres, suggest we
exercise due caution in applying their observations to the
earlier period.
The following list indicates the general periods during with the
authors were writing, and translations used.
5th century BCE:
Herodotos, Histories, (various)
2nd century BCE:
Polybius, Rise of the Roman Empire, (trans. W.R. Paton)
135-50 BCE:
Poseidonios, Histories, (quoted in Athenaeus)
early 1st century BCE:
Diodoros Siculus, The Library of History, (trans. C. H.
Oldfather)
1st century BCE:
Caesar, The Gallic War, (trans. C. Hammond)
64 BCE - ca. AD 23:
Strabo, Geography, (trans. H.L. Jones)
59 BCE - AD 17:
Livy, History of Rome from its Foundation, (trans.A. de
Sélincourt)
AD 98:
Tacitus, Germania, (trans. H. Mattingly, S.A. Handford rev.)
1st - early 2nd century AD:
Plutarch, Life of Camillus, (trans. J. Dryden)
ca. AD 200:
Athenaus, Deipnosophistai, IV.151 ff., (trans. C.B. Gulick)
II. Discussions
Useful to the student of "Celtic"-Mediterranean interactions are
numerous studies of individual authors, among them Tierney
(1960) and Alonso-Nùñez (1994) on Poseidonios, or Walbank's 1970
commentary on Polybius.
Dirkzwager presents an extremely detailed study of Gallia
Narbonensis in Strabo, while Burkert is informative about
Herodotos and the beliefs of the barbarians of his time. Ancient
thought about the barbarian "other" and the nature of
civilization are the objects of a great deal of attention;
approaching them from very different points of view are, e.g.,
Blundell (1986) on ancient models of civilization, Müller (1972)
on ancient ethnography and Nippel (1990) on barbarians in
ancient society and law. Dihle (1994) takes a historical
approach to the changing relationships of the Greeks to the
barbarians within their ken. Essential are Momigliano's studies
of ancient historiography, the Greeks and the barbarians.
The ancient authors are invoked by every general history or
survey of "Celtic" history, society or art. Specific studies
analyzing the sources and their historical implications in
Celtic studies include Hachmann (1962) on Celtic identity,
Nachtergael (1977) on the "Celts" at Delphi; Rankin (1987) and
Cunliffe (1988) on the "Celts" from the classical perspective;
and Freeman's 1994 dissertation on early classical sources and
Celtic beliefs.
The wealth of material -- ancient sources and modern commentary
-- while gratifying, serves also to highlight the great void at
the center of all our investigations, the lack of literature by
the ancient "Celts" themselves.